Participants
Who participates in the governed relationship.
CRU allows governed computational objects to cross boundaries without requiring participating domains to surrender control of their own governance.
An organization may establish governance over the resources, operations, relationships, and computational objects within its legitimate domain. A CRU can carry verifiable evidence of decisions made under that governance.
Portable governance does not mean universal authority.
A CRU provides a computational boundary within which identity, state, evidence, provenance, and governing conditions can be evaluated coherently. But the CRU’s governance boundary does not eliminate the authority boundary of the receiving system.
The object carries its governance.
The receiving domain retains its authority.
Governance evaluates evidence and context under applicable policy.
A Governed Result expresses an outcome under defined conditions and authority—not authorization everywhere.
Every Governed Result exists within an Authority Context: which authority produced it, for what purpose, under what governance, and within what boundary it applies.
A Governed Result can travel farther than the authority under which it was produced.
Domain B may verify Alice’s identity, state, provenance, and assertions from Domain A. That establishes authenticity. It does not require Domain B to grant Alice authority.
The source domain determines the semantics and context of what it presents. The receiving domain determines whether that information is admissible and what local effect it may have.
Both domains retain their own authority.
Where domains choose to federate, they can establish an agreed and bounded mapping. The mapping defines how legitimate evidence or authority from one context may be interpreted within another; it does not manufacture authority.
Sometimes organizations need more than recognition of one another’s assertions. They may need to govern a shared resource, mission, service, relationship, or process together. That requires explicit shared governance.
A CRU Contract establishes a governed relationship among participating domains.
Who participates in the governed relationship.
What authority is explicitly contributed.
What each participant is accountable for.
When the relationship applies.
How shared decisions are evaluated.
How the relationship evolves or ends.
Shared authority must be explicit rather than assumed.
A governed relationship may involve two organizations—or many. The number of participants does not change the principle: each participates under explicit governance, limited to powers actually delegated.
CRU-TR can represent governed dependencies and event relationships.
CRU-TR can initiate governance. It cannot manufacture authority.
The receiving domain remains responsible for its own resources.
Verify what another domain presents. Understand the authority under which it was produced. Determine whether it is admissible locally. Apply local governance. Share governance explicitly when necessary.
CRU makes governance portable without making authority universal.
See how the same governed-object model responds when roles, missions, risks and domains change.
Explore Use Cases →